Letter: Normal Glucose Tolerance with a High 1-Hour Postload Plasma Glucose Level Exhibits Decreased β-Cell Function Similar to Impaired Glucose Tolerance (Diabetes Metab J 2015;39:147-53)

Corresponding author: Hee Kyung Kim Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, 322 Seoyang-ro, Hwasun 519-763, Korea E-mail: [email protected] A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is a sensitive test in most populations for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and commonly used to identify high-risk individuals of T2DM [1]. The diagnostic criteria define diabetes as a fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL or a 2-hour glucose challenge ≥200 mg/dL, but not including 1-hour glucose level. Recently, data obtained in population studies have suggested that 1-hour glucose level after OGTT can provide a better predictor for development of T2DM than fasting or 2-hour glucose [2]. And, subjects with 1-hour glucose levels of ≥155 mg/dL with normal glucose tolerance (NGT 1-hour high) have been considered as high risk of T2DM [3], which were more insulin-resistant and worse β-cell function than subjects with NGT 1 hour-low (<155 mg/dL) [4]. In this article entitled “Normal glucose tolerance with a high 1-hour postload plasma glucose level exhibits decreased β-cell function similar to impaired glucose tolerance,” Oh et al. [5] compared β-cell function between subjects with NGT 1 hourhigh, 1 hour-low, and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). The interesting point was that subjects with NGT 1 hour-high group have decreased insulin sensitivity even after adjusting β-cell function, which was similar degree as subjects with IGT in Korean. However, there are several issues that need to be addressed. First, the sensitivity of indicator of insulin secretion and resistance status should be considered. There are differences of opinion as to which diagnostic test represents the “gold standard” for assessing the insulin sensitivity and resistance. In this study, there are significant difference in NGT 1 hour-high and NGT 1 hour-low groups: Matsuda index, oral disposition index, and insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2. However, insulinogenic index, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-β-cell and HOMA-insulin resistance were similar between two groups. It is needed to be clarifying whether insulin resistance is not different between the NGT 1-hour high and low group, because of the conflicting results about insulin resistant marker. Second, association between NGT 1-hour high group and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) should be considered. Both IGT and IFG conditions are intermediate states of abnormal carbohydrate metabolism between NGT and T2DM, and those are considered as high risk factor for development of T2DM. Lifestyle modification and pharmacologic therapy could prevent the progression of disease in subjects with prediabetic condition (IGT and IFG). In IFG, there is marked hepatic insulin resistance with near-normal muscle insulin sensitivity, whereas this pattern is reversed in IGT [6]. Although both conditions are characterized by reduced earlyphase insulin secretion, there is an additional impairment of latephase insulin secretion in IGT. In this study, insulin sensitivity Letter